Credible. Verifiable. Repeatable. Magnet Forensics Founder and CTO, Jad Saliba, and Jamie McQuaid, our Forensics Consultant, have made it clear how fundamental these elements are to an investigation. They both insist that a tool box approach is the only “right” way to investigate evidence and achieve these results. Jamie McQuaid and Jessica Hyde, our Director of Forensics, have written a series of blog posts that will walk through how to ingest various images from third-party sources (Cellebrite, XRY, and Oxygen) into AXIOM and how to export an AXIOM image for use with other tools.
from Forensic Focus http://ift.tt/2nQvCtR
Wednesday, February 7, 2018
4 Ways to Warm Up During Winter
Content originally published and Shared from http://perfectbath.com
Yes, baby, it’s cold outside. So why not stay at home where you can feel more comfortable by doing these easy tips?
Photo by Toa Heftiba on Unsplash
Bundle up
Cover those places where blood flows close to the skin, Salz says. He recommends covering your wrists with a long-sleeve shirt, throwing on a sweater with a turtleneck collar to warm your neck, and pulling on socks long enough to cover your ankles. And don’t forget to cover your head — a baseball cap will do fine indoors. Source: BHG
Reverse the fan
If you’re up for a little science experiment, you can harness the physics of your ceiling fan in order to keep warm. Since warm air rises, you can use your ceiling fan to push it back down towards the ground. Simply reverse the direction of your fan and keep it on low so it doesn’t stir up a big breeze. Source: Greatist
Stay active
Get up and get moving! An active body heats up quickly – run, dance, jump until you break a sweat. You can jump for a few minutes, ride an exercise cycle or dance to your favorite music. And if you don’t mind being a little cold at first, a mile’s walk around the neighborhood will get you sweating pretty quickly. Source: WikiHow
Switch between hot and cold water in the shower
Hot showers immediately warm you up, but cold showers improve blood circulation between your skin and organs. Cold showers are also correlated with a stronger immune system. Source: MentalFloss
You know what’s the most relaxing way to stay warm during a cold winter night? Step in the sauna! Have one at your home so you can make every night a spa night. Call us!
Contact:
Perfect Bath
Phone: Toll Free 1-866-843-1641
Calgary, Alberta
Email: info@perfectbath.com
The post 4 Ways to Warm Up During Winter appeared first on Perfect Bath Canada.
from Perfect Bath Canada http://ift.tt/2C0QDa8
Tuesday, February 6, 2018
Do Cell Phone Safety Gadgets Work?
I love fielding your questions, and I’m often asked, Do Cell Phone Safety Gadgets Work? The answer is fairly simple. They provide a false sense of security. What I’m referring to here is a range of devices including stickers, phone cases, and purses. These gadgets purport to block the radio frequency radiation (RFR) that your cell phone emits.
After I wrote about my life-changing experience with radiation in The Green House That Almost Killed Me, I received hundreds of questions from you. One of the most frequent was about shielding yourself from your cell phone. Below are my thoughts on whether this works and how to protect yourself from RFR.
Phone Shield Devices are a Scam
Unfortunately, phone shielding devices are money making gimmicks. They are not as effective as switching your phone off, which costs nothing. If these shields were effective they would protect you from radiation and thereby block the phone signal. If it’s getting through you are exposed to radiation. Sadly, the levels that come from cell phones are high.
How to Shield Yourself for Free
If you want to shield yourself from RFR set your phone to airplane mode. If you are using a shield and you’re still getting calls and texts then you remain exposed to RFR. It might provide emotional comfort, but is not a real solution.
The Problem with Phone Shields
When your phone is out of range it creates more RFR. This leads to concern that the phone will actually work harder to connect to WiFi or the cellular network and actually emit more RFR.
Are Cell Phones Dangerous?
If you’re wondering whether or not to keep your cell phone on your body you’ll definitely want to hop over to my post called Are Cell Phones Dangerous? In it, I link to everything from Scientific American to research studies conducted by the National Institute of Health.
Do you carry your cell phone on your body? Did you know that the cell phone manufacturer’s manuals advise against this? Leave a comment and let me know what you do to reduce radiation from your cell phone!
The post Do Cell Phone Safety Gadgets Work? appeared first on Elana's Pantry.
from Elana's Pantry http://ift.tt/2GU3bnD
Continuing Problems in Uses of Deadly Force
“While saying it found ‘much to agree with’ in a consultant’s report, the Madison Police Department rejected a recommendation to move toward a more stringent standard for the use of deadly force…”
The local news account continues…
“In a 76-page document released Wednesday, the [Madison] Police Department addresses each of 146 recommendations made in the California-based OIR Group’s report, released Dec. 14 after a year of research and in the wake of a string of high-profile fatal police shootings…” [Wisconsin State Journal, Feb. 1, 2018]
This is the struggle that is going on in many of our nation’s cities. Police resistance in moving toward a “more stringent standard for the use of deadly force.”
On the other hand, some police agencies have come to understand that their community’s desire to raise the bar on uses of deadly force. A good example is what is going on in Camden, NJ after that community abolished its police department and went to a county agency under the leadership of Scott Thompson. Also, cities which have been under DOJ consent decrees have committed to raising the standard while other police agencies across the county and for a variety of reasons do not.
Sadly, Madison, Wisc., a city I served as chief of police for over 20 years, is now one of those agencies. Madison has taken a ‘low bar” approach to use of deadly force in spite of what a recent study by the OIR Group found in a study and survey last year. I would have thought they would have modeled the high bar approach.
While the citizen survey taken by OIR indicates very high levels of satisfaction with the Madison department in terms of professionalism (81%), safety (75%), responsiveness (71%), and fairness (55%), one area seems to stand apart — it has to do with use of force:
“Question: Have recent officer-involved shootings and force incidents involving MPD made you concerned about when and how the Department uses force, including deadly force?” to which over 50% of those responding indicated they were “concerned” or “very concerned.”
To me, that is the area in which the department needs to focus — to allay citizen concerns about how and when they will use deadly force.
In order to do this, there must be a deep and open community-police discussion about deadly force use (especially within the black community).
Citizens across the city need to be asked, “How do you want your police to act in these situations?” I believe modern democratic policing today is a matter of gaining “permission” from the community to be policed. It is an essential part of effective community-oriented policing and developing problem-oriented community partnerships. Recently, Prof. Barry Friedman from NYU Law School argues this point in his book, Unwarranted: Policing Without Permission. (It should be on the reading list of every for police and community leader.)
Last year, a national group of progressive police chiefs (the Police Executive Research Forum [PERF] headquartered in Washington, DC) published their “Guiding Principles in Use of Force.” They wrote in part:
- “Agencies should continue to develop best policies, practices, and training on use-of-force issues that go beyond the minimum requirements of Graham v. Connor.
“The U.S. Supreme Court’s landmark 1989 decision, Graham v. Connor, holds that police use of force is to be judged against a standard of ‘objective reasonableness’ under the 4th Amendment ban on ‘unreasonable searches and seizures.’ Specifically, the Court stated:
“The ‘reasonableness’ of a particular use of force must be judged from the perspective of a reasonable officer on the scene, rather than with the 20/20 vision of hindsight…. The calculus of reasonableness must embody allowance for the fact that police officers are often forced to make split-second judgments—in circumstances that are tense, uncertain, and rapidly evolving—about the amount of force that is necessary in a particular situation.
“In Graham v. Connor, the Supreme Court outlines broad principles on how police use of force is to be considered and judged. But the Court leaves it to individual police agencies to determine how best to incorporate those principles into their own policies and training, in order to direct officers on how to perform their duties on a daily basis” (my emphasis) …
“In this report, PERF recommends a number of policies that, while not currently required by the Supreme Court’s standard, should be considered nonetheless, in the view of leading PERF chiefs. Many of these policies have already been adopted in some departments, including
- A duty to intervene if officers witness colleagues using excessive or unnecessary force;
- Requiring officers to render first aid to subjects who have been injured as a result of police actions;
- Prohibiting use of deadly force against persons who pose a danger only to themselves; and
- Specific limits on shooting at vehicles.
“By adopting these and other policies, departments can take steps that help prevent officers from being placed in situations where they have no choice but to make split-second decisions that may result in injuries or death to themselves or others.” (also, my emphasis)…
In my experience, police use of deadly force is less about the permissiveness of law and more about how citizens expect their police to act in these circumstances. Our criminal law is usually quite broad. Citizens can demand their police act in more restrictive ways.
For example, when I came to Wisconsin in 1972, the state law permitted police to use deadly force to stop any fleeing felon. My sense from the community was that the they did not want their police officers shooting unarmed persons and so we established a policy and training regimen that restricted police use of force in these situations — even while the state law permitted use of deadly force! (Years later in 1985, the USSC in Garner v. Tennessee prohibited police from doing this and our policy became the law of the land!) The same should happen with Graham. We also put controls on when our police were permitted to engage in high-speed pursuits and a method to terminate them when they became too dangerous.
I will also venture to say that given findings in Madison’s OIR Report and my own personal experience, citizens in this city expect their police to be more controlled in their use of deadly force and to manage non-firearm stand-offs, whenever possible without taking a life. This would be in keeping with the first PERF guideline in use of force, “The sanctity of human life should be at the heart of everything a [police] agency does.”
The $7 million jury award last year in the 2014 death of Ashley DiPiazza, a 26-year-old Army veteran, and over $5.5 million payed out to settle the civil claims in the deaths of Paul Heenan and Tony Robinson, should have been a wake-up call for the city and its leaders. In each case the District Attorney and outside investigators ruled the officers had acted according to the law. But a jury in the DiPiazza case thought otherwise.
Improving police use of force will take patience, persistence, and the passion of both police and community members. I say this because it ultimately is about changing a now-established culture within the police department. Absent a strong statement by police and community leaders that these three deaths are not standard practice and that measures will be taken to assure this does not become so, events like these will continue.
Change can happen, but it will only happen when citizens strongly and unequivocally demand these changes and police leaders are committed to leading them.
And they do so because it is the right and moral thing to do. And doing so will make their city’s “finest” police department even better!
from Improving Police http://ift.tt/2E6vfCe
Interview With Barbara Guttman, Software Quality Group Manager, NIST
Barbara, tell us a bit about yourself. What's your role, and what does a typical day in your life look like? As the Manager of the Software Quality Group, I work on 3 major projects including digital forensics, software assurance and software metrology. Even in digital forensics there are several projects, so I get to move from topic to topic. Friday, I gave a 5 year review of our digital forensics program to NIST management, helped a fellow manager in the Applied Security Division create a vacancy announcement, and spent some time reading about about new approaches to software assurance. Read More
from Forensic Focus http://ift.tt/2nLYRxP
from Forensic Focus http://ift.tt/2nLYRxP
Monday, February 5, 2018
Main & Twentieth – Availability, Plans, Prices
At a Glance
- located at the corner of Main & 20th
- 4-storey mixed-use building
- 42 condominiums
- groundfloor retail
- lush central courtyard
- convenient access to transit
- near Queen Elizabeth Park & Hillcrest Community Centre
- numerous independent cafes, restaurants, shops
The New Hub
Make your move to Vancouver’s most vibrant, happening neighborhood: Main Street. Main & Twentieth is a collection of 42 boutique one bedroom, two bedroom, and loft homes featuring stylish interiors, open layouts with abundant natural light, generous outdoor spaces, and a beautiful, lush central courtyard. Designed by Yamamoto Architects to enhance and reflect the exciting neighbourhood surroundings, living at Main & Twentieth puts you exactly where you want to be – at the centre of it all.
Be A Presale Condo VIP!
Find Out About New Presales & Get Access to VIP Openings & Special Promotions!
Are you a realtor? Click here
Main Street is at the epicentre of everything trendy and happening in Vancouver. Independent restaurants, cafes, cocktail bars, and boutiques abound, as well as services and groceries for everyday needs. Queen Elizabeth Park and Hillcrest Community Centre provide recreation options, and there are many schools of all levels in this family-friendly area. Friendly and unpretentious, this neighbourhood sits right between East Van and the Westside and has all the advantages of both.
Pricing for Main & Twentieth
This development is in pre-construction, but sales will begin soon. Sign up to our VIP list above for priority access to Main & Twentieth updates.
Floor Plans for Main & Twentieth
A mix of 1-bedrooms, 2-bedrooms, and lofts with open floorplans from 500 – 1,500 sq ft are available. Contact me today to discuss availability and plans according to your needs.
Amenities at Main & Twentieth
A central courtyard offers another natural light source for residences in this building which is not usually associated with these types of developments.
Parking and Storage
Main & Twentieth will offer one level of underground parking accessed from the lane.
Maintenance Fees at Main & Twentieth
TBA.
Developer Team for Main & Twentieth
With a history extending almost 30 years, and business operations stretching from Hong Kong and the Chinese mainland to the North American market, Landa has built its success on its unique vision, rich experience, genuine quality, and positive enterprising spirit.
Yamamoto Architecture is a young design-oriented firm focused on multi-family and mixed-use buildings. They are currently working on projects ranging in scale from single-family homes to concrete high-rises.
Expected Completion for Main & Twentieth
2021.
Are you interested in learning more about other homes in the Cambie Corridor, Riley Park, or Southeast False Creek?
Have a look at these great Mount Pleasant Presale Condos!
The post Main & Twentieth – Availability, Plans, Prices appeared first on Mike Stewart.
from Blog – Mike Stewart http://ift.tt/2nHdJ1r
University Heights by Holborn in Squamish
Situated on one of the highest elevations in Squamish, UNIVERSITY HEIGHTS by Holborn offers panoramic mountain views next to Quest University within the Garibaldi Highlands community. Centrally located within a 5 minutes’ drive to downtown Squamish, UNIVERSITY HEIGHTS by Holborn offers exclusive private community living whilst remaining easily accessible to your everyday needs.
With spectacular view lots ranging from 6,784 to 17,300 square feet, UNIVERSITY HEIGHTS by Holborn ensures your new home will be everything you want it to be.
Phase 2 Lots 94-111 NOW SELLING!
The post University Heights by Holborn in Squamish appeared first on Vancouver New Condos.
from Buildings – Vancouver New Condos http://ift.tt/2BXbKKJ
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)